Same price ≈ $3,200
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thickness 29 mm vs 33 mm
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
4% pricier ≈ $3,200
- Weight 2.61 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thickness 23 mm vs 33 mm
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
- Battery capacity 96 Wh vs 100 Wh
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 7,424
8% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thickness 27 mm vs 33 mm
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 7,424
6% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Thickness 23 mm vs 33 mm
- Weight 2.68 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 100 Wh
- RAM (base) 16 GB vs 32 GB
7% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
- Thickness 30 mm vs 33 mm
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 7,424
13% cheaper ≈ $2,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 12 GB
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thickness 27 mm vs 33 mm
- GPU shader cores 3,072 vs 7,424
- CPU cores 10 vs 24
8% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
8% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.86 kg
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 7,424
- Video memory 8 GB vs 12 GB
13% pricier ≈ $3,500
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Weight 2.65 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
8% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.86 kg
- Thickness 27 mm vs 33 mm
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 7,424