NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
Search/2026
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
CompareRankings
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs XMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)

What Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) does better (5) and where Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
Medion · 2024Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $3,100
vs
XMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
XMG · 2025Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $3,200
Higher score
2.6Memory & storage2.6
4.0Battery & portability2.1
8.4Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
383 × 27233402 × 26529
Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)Difference
Depth272 mm265 mm+7 mm
Width383 mm402 mm−19 mm
Thickness33 mm29 mm+4 mm
Weight2.9 kg2.8 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?

  1. Battery capacity100 Wh vs 73 Wh+37%
  2. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025): No
  3. GPU shader cores7,424 vs 4,608+61%
  4. CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
  5. Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%

Why is Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?

  1. Weight2.86 kg vs 2.8 kg+2%
  2. Thickness33 mm vs 29 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)≈ $3,1005.4
XMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)XMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)≈ $3,2005.8
Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4080 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
Video memory12 GB12 GB
Video memory type—GDDR7
GPU shader cores7,4244,608
Processor
ProcessorCore i9-14900HXRyzen 9 9955HX
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores2416
Max CPU clock5.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Processor optionsCore i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX—
Display
Screen size17.3″17.3″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Brightness—300 nits
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB32 GB
RAM (base)32 GB32 GB
SSD (up to)1,000 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB1,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity100 Wh73 Wh
Design & cooling
Weight2.86 kg2.8 kg
Thickness33 mm29 mm
Width383 mm402 mm
Depth272 mm265 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPort—Yes
Ethernet—5 Gbit/s
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYesYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6—
Bluetooth5.15
Keyboard & camera
Webcam1,080p1,080p
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2 speakers

Related comparisons

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.25.4Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.35.4Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare