vs
3.8Memory & storage2.8
2.5Battery & portability4.0
6.0Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
| Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) | Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 272 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 383 mm | +15 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 33 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.9 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- Thickness28 mm vs 33 mm+18%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores6 vs 244×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 100 Wh+20%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 7,424+61%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight2.95 kg vs 2.86 kg+3%
- SD card readerNo · Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,746 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.86 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 33 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 383 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 272 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.2vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.67.2