NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
Search/2026
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
CompareRankings
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) vs XMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

What Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) does better (5) and where Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
Medion · 2024Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $3,100
vs
XMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
XMG · 2025Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ $2,900
Higher score
2.6Memory & storage3.5
4.0Battery & portability8.0
8.4Features & cooling3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
383 × 27233357 × 25426
Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Difference
Depth272 mm254 mm+18 mm
Width383 mm357 mm+26 mm
Thickness33 mm26 mm+7 mm
Weight2.9 kg2.4 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?

  1. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
  2. CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
  3. GPU shader cores7,424 vs 5,888+26%
  4. Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
  5. Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%

Why is Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?

  1. SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
  2. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
  3. Weight2.86 kg vs 2.45 kg+17%
  4. Thickness33 mm vs 26 mm+27%
  5. Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)≈ $3,1005.4
XMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)XMG Apex 16 Max RTX 5070 Ti (2025)≈ $2,9007.4
Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4080 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
Video memory12 GB12 GB
Video memory type—GDDR7
GPU shader cores7,4245,888
Processor
ProcessorCore i9-14900HXRyzen 9 9955HX
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores2416
Max CPU clock5.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Processor optionsCore i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX—
Display
Screen size17.3″16″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz300 Hz
Panel type—IPS
Brightness—500 nits
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB32 GB
RAM (base)32 GB32 GB
SSD (up to)1,000 GB2,000 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB1,000 GB
Battery & power
Battery capacity100 Wh100 Wh
Power adapter—240 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.86 kg2.45 kg
Thickness33 mm26 mm
Width383 mm357 mm
Depth272 mm254 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPort—Yes
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYes—
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.15.3
Keyboard & camera
Webcam1,080p1,080p
Audio
Speakers2 speakers—

Related comparisons

Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7Lenovo LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Lenovo LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.45.4Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.65.4Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Acer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare