13% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,072 vs 2,560
- Max CPU clock 5.1 GHz vs 4.8 GHz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 90 Wh
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
8% pricier ≈ $1,350
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
6% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 12 vs 8
- Battery capacity 58 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.27 kg
Same price ≈ $1,250
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 14 vs 8
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.27 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
14% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
10% pricier ≈ $1,350
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.27 kg
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
10% pricier ≈ $1,350
- CPU cores 14 vs 8
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.27 kg
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
19% pricier ≈ $1,450
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 10 vs 8
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.27 kg
- SSD (base) 500 GB vs 1,000 GB
6% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.27 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
30% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- CPU cores 10 vs 8
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB