vs
4.2Display8.0
2.4Memory & storage3.2
9.4Battery & portability9.1
6.4Features & cooling6.3
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Legion 5 15 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.1″+6%
Why is Legion 5 15 RTX 5050 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.2 kg+3%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 9,895 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 250 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i7-13650HX, Ryzen 7 250 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 11,707 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,616 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 850 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 150 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | No |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | — | 21.5 mm |
| Width | — | 344.9 mm |
| Depth | — | 255.3 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50.1 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
MSI Sword 15 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.66.0
vs
MSI Sword 17 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.86.0

