vs
4.2Display3.3
2.4Memory & storage2.9
9.4Battery & portability7.7
6.4Features & cooling5.4
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.36 kg+4%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 145 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 10,614 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-13500HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.36 kg |
| Thickness | — | 24 mm |
| Width | — | 369 mm |
| Depth | — | 259 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 58.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | No |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.96.0
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.36.0
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 8 AMD RTX 3050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.76.0

