vs
4.2Display3.8
2.4Memory & storage2.7
9.4Battery & portability8.1
6.4Features & cooling6.8
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.33 kg+3%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 120 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 12,750 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Ryzen 5 8645HS, Core i7-14700HX, Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 62% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 41% |
| Pixel density | — | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.33 kg |
| Thickness | — | 23 mm |
| Width | — | 369 mm |
| Depth | — | 259 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 48 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
MSI Sword 15 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.66.0
vs
MSI Sword 17 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.86.0

