pan.tf
Compare
Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) vs Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) vs XMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

What Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) does better (5) and where Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (10) — every spec side by side.

HP · 2025Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)

7.8Score

5 advantages

XMG · 2025Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

8.1Score

10 advantages≈ $4,900

Higher score

5.6Display9.8

5.1Memory & storage3.7

6.6Battery & portability6.0

8.4Features & cooling8.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

	Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)	Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)	Difference
Depth	269 mm	260 mm	+9 mm
Width	357.5 mm	357 mm	+0.5 mm
Thickness	22.7 mm	28 mm	−5.3 mm
Weight	2.4 kg	2.6 kg	−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?

Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
Weight2.42 kg vs 2.65 kg+10%
Thickness22.7 mm vs 28 mm+23%
SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
Battery capacity70 Wh vs 100 Wh+43%
GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
SD card readerNo · Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025): Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.8	XMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)≈ $4,9008.1
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	105 W	—
Video memory	8 GB	24 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	4,608	10,496
GPU compute (FP32)	24.2 TFLOPS	—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	14,043	—
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	14	—
CPU threads	14	—
Max CPU clock	4.9 GHz	—
Processor options	Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H	Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Geekbench 6 multi-core	13,432	—
Geekbench 6 single-core	2,779	—
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	1,021	—
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	1920 × 1200	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	144 Hz	300 Hz
Panel type	IPS	Mini-LED
Brightness	300 nits	500 nits
sRGB coverage	62%	—
Response time	3 ms	—
Pixel density	142 ppi	—
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
HDR	No	—
Touchscreen	No	—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	32 GB
RAM type	DDR5	—
RAM speed	5,600 MHz	—
Max. supported RAM	32 GB	—
RAM slots	2	—
Upgradable RAM	Yes	—
SSD (up to)	2,048 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	—
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	—
Battery & power
Battery capacity	70 Wh	100 Wh
Power adapter	150 W	330 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.42 kg	2.65 kg
Thickness	22.7 mm	28 mm
Width	357.5 mm	357 mm
Depth	269 mm	260 mm
Body material	Aluminium, Plastic	—
Colours	Black	Black
Cooling fans	2	—
Vapor chamber cooling	No	—
Liquid metal (CPU)	No	—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	USB4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
USB-C ports	1	—
USB-A ports	3	—
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	Yes
Ethernet	—	5 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	No	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	—
Bluetooth	5.4	5
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	—
Numeric keypad	Yes	—
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	No	—
Fingerprint reader	No	—
Audio
Speakers	2.0	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	No	—