HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Memory & storage2.6
Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 99 Wh+41%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 24.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,043 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | — |
| CPU threads | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,432 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,779 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,021 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | — |
| Width | 357.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.97.7vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.77.8
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.87.7
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.77.7
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)