vs
5.6Display9.2
5.1Memory & storage3.7
Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
Why is Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 80 Wh+14%
- CPU cores14 vs 24+71%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 24.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,043 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,432 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,779 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,021 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | — |
| Width | 357.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.97.8vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)7.87.9vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)7.88.1vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5080 (2025)7.88.1