HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
What Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Memory & storage4.3
Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 300 Hz2.1×
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 99 Wh+41%
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- CPU cores14 vs 24+71%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 7,680+67%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.5 GHz+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 24.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,043 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,432 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,779 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,021 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | — |
| Width | 357.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.97.7vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.77.8
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.87.7
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.77.7
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)