Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Medion Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)
What TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (8) and where Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Memory & storage2.2
9.4Battery & portability9.7
6.4Features & cooling4.6
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz+14%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 93 Wh+3%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.2 kg+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 5600H |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 93 Wh |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | — | 23 mm |
| Width | — | 360 mm |
| Depth | — | 240 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vsLenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.0
vsMSI Sword 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.36.0