Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (6) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display4.2
3.2Memory & storage2.4
8.4Battery & portability9.4
7.6Features & cooling6.4
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.27 kg+3%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+8%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,717 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-14650HX | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.27 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | — |
| Width | 354 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)7.57.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.57.4
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)7.67.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)7.57.4
vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)7.77.5
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0