vs
4.2Display4.3
2.4Memory & storage5.1
9.4Battery & portability4.3
6.4Features & cooling4.5
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 60 Wh+50%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.4 kg+6%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4060 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 10,342 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,549 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,502 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 752 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | — | 25.2 mm |
| Width | — | 359.6 mm |
| Depth | — | 264.8 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Gray |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 52 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
Dell G16 7630 RTX 3050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.86.0
vs
Dell G15 5535 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0

