vs
4.2Display7.4
2.4Memory & storage6.4
9.4Battery & portability3.9
6.4Features & cooling8.4
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than G16 7630 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 86 Wh+5%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.73 kg+20%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 256 GB3.9×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 2,048+25%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+4%
Why is G16 7630 RTX 3050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 95 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 7.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 5,512 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core i5-13450HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 11,559 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,405 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 810 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 98% |
| Response time | — | 12 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 78% |
| Pixel density | — | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 256 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 86 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.73 kg |
| Thickness | — | 25.6 mm |
| Width | — | 357 mm |
| Depth | — | 288.7 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 53.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | No |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.0
vs
MSI Sword 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.36.0

