vs
4.2Display2.1
2.4Memory & storage6.4
9.4Battery & portability2.6
6.4Features & cooling4.2
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than G15 5535 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · G15 5535 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 86 Wh+5%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.81 kg+24%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 256 GB3.9×
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is G15 5535 RTX 4070 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 13,456 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,627 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,583 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 764 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Response time | — | 35 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 256 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 86 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.81 kg |
| Thickness | — | 26.9 mm |
| Width | — | 357.3 mm |
| Depth | — | 274.5 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
MSI Crosshair 17 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.86.0

