Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (12) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Graphics7.5
7.1Overall performance7.8
7.1Display7.3
8.0Memory & storage6.6
9.2Battery & portability9.7
8.8Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 243 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 48 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 11,550+9%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 3,200 MHz2.3×
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR4
- CPU cores16 vs 14+14%
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 22.3 mm+7%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)51 dB vs 60 dB+18%
- CPU threads22 vs 20+10%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+2%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.8 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS+45%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,095 vs 13,958+38%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 120 W+9%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2 kg+2%
- HDRNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 1,091+11%
- Key travel1.5 mm vs 1.7 mm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.8 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,095 | 13,958 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i7-12700H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13620H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 11,550 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 2,458 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 1,091 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 74% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 48 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 1 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22.3 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 243 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 60 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)8.36.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.1vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.38.0vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3