Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (13) and where ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Graphics8.2
7.1Overall performance8.9
7.1Display6.4
8.0Memory & storage8.6
9.2Battery & portability3.1
8.8Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 282 mm | −32.8 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 395 mm | −39 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 30.8 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2.8 kg+37%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 30.8 mm+48%
- CPU cores16 vs 12+33%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+56%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.8 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+58%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 140 W+27%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 18,694+49%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,095 vs 14,149+40%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 1,504+54%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- HDRNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,465 vs 3,249+32%
- Key travel1.5 mm vs 1.9 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.8 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,095 | 14,149 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 9 7845HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 18,694 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 3,249 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 1,504 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 30.8 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 282 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver | Black, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 49 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.9 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)8.36.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.1vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.38.0
vsAsus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3vsAsus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.1