Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs MSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (12) and where Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Graphics7.8
7.1Overall performance8.1
7.1Display7.1
8.0Memory & storage5.3
9.2Battery & portability7.4
8.8Features & cooling7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) | Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 298 mm | −48.8 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 380 mm | −24 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 3.1 kg | −1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Weight2.05 kg vs 3.1 kg+51%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 23 mm+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+33%
- Fan noise (max. load)51 dB vs 59 dB+16%
- Pixel density138 ppi vs 133 ppi+4%
Why is Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 100 Wh+31%
- GPU compute (FP32)13.8 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+58%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 140 W+27%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,095 vs 13,260+31%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.8 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,095 | 13,260 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 22 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 133 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 380 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 59 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)8.36.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.38.0vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 15 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3
vs
MSI Raider GE68 HX 14V RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)9.28.1