- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (6) and where ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Memory & storage9.2
9.2Battery & portability4.4
8.8Features & cooling9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 264 mm | −14.8 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 354 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 30 mm | −9.2 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2.5 kg+22%
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 30 mm+44%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 4,000 GB+2%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+56%
Why is ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 7,4242.4×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 4,000 GB7.8×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,095 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i9-13980HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 22 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 4,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 264 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.1
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 15 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.38.3
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.18.0
vs
MSI Crosshair 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.18.0
