9% pricier ≈ $2,200
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,977 vs 5,687
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 73 Wh
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)
9% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,184 vs 5,687
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Weight 2.81 kg vs 1.46 kg
- Response time 9 ms vs 3 ms
7% pricier ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 73 Wh
7% pricier ≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.9 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 400 nits
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,372 vs 5,687
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 1.87 kg vs 1.46 kg
18% pricier ≈ $2,350
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,220 vs 5,687
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 73 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 1.99 kg vs 1.46 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
8% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,127 vs 5,687
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.46 kg
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 216 ppi
14% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,480 vs 5,687
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.7 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 1.9 kg vs 1.46 kg
- CPU cores 8 vs 12
4% pricier ≈ $2,100
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,791 vs 5,687
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 1.46 kg
- RAM type DDR5 vs LPDDR5X
18% pricier ≈ $2,350
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 3 ms
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 73 Wh
25% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.1 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,426 vs 5,687
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 1.46 kg