- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,739 vs 5,702
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.6 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,304 vs 1,536
Alternatives to Alienware m17 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the m17 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m17 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,263 vs 5,702
- GPU shader cores 1,920 vs 1,536
- GPU compute (FP32) 4.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,234 vs 5,702
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,522 vs 5,702
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,979 vs 5,702
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.9 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,474 vs 5,702
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.1 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,705 vs 5,702
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,233 vs 4,836
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,456 vs 5,702
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,407 vs 5,702
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,233 vs 4,836
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 744 vs 280
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4