NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Series
  3. Razer Blade 16
Razer

Razer Blade 16: every generation

16 generations from 2023 to 2026, latest — Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026). What each generation gained and lost.

2026
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
Core Ultra 9 386H175 W16″2.14 kg
9.7
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS → 51.4 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 22,607 → 26,695
  • Video memory 16 GB → 24 GB
  • GPU shader cores 7,680 → 10,496
Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026) vs Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026) — full comparison
2026
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
Core Ultra 9 386H175 W16″2.14 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS → 42 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,714 → 22,607
  • GPU power (TGP) 115 W → 175 W
  • Brightness 400 nits → 1,100 nits
Worse
  • SSD (up to) 8,192 GB → 3,000 GB
Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026) vs Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026) — full comparison
2026
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026)
Core Ultra 9 386H115 W16″2.14 kg
9.2
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
  • CPU cores 8 → 16
  • Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,856 → 16,854
  • Cinebench 2024 multi-core 913 → 1,231
  • Advanced Optimus
Worse
  • GPU compute (FP32) 47.7 TFLOPS → 18.4 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 28,136 → 11,714
  • Video memory 24 GB → 8 GB
Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026) — full comparison
2025
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
Ryzen AI 7 350160 W16″2.1 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 39 TFLOPS → 47.7 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,953 → 28,136
  • Video memory 16 GB → 24 GB
  • GPU shader cores 7,680 → 10,496
Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025) — full comparison
2025
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)
Ryzen AI 7 350160 W16″2.1 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
  • GPU power (TGP) 140 W → 160 W
  • GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS → 39 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,614 → 23,953
  • Video memory 12 GB → 16 GB
Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025) — full comparison
2025
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Ryzen AI 7 350140 W16″2.1 kg
9.5
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
  • GPU power (TGP) 125 W → 140 W
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,846 → 19,614
  • Video memory 8 GB → 12 GB
  • GPU compute (FP32) 28.2 TFLOPS → 31.2 TFLOPS
Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) — full comparison
2025
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
Ryzen AI 7 350125 W16″2.1 kg
9.4
Better than Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS → 28.2 TFLOPS
  • GPU power (TGP) 115 W → 125 W
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,623 → 14,846
  • GPU shader cores 3,328 → 4,608
Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025) — full comparison
2025
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
Ryzen AI 7 350115 W16″2.1 kg
9.1
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024)
  • Weight 2.45 kg → 2.1 kg
  • Thickness 22 mm → 17.4 mm
  • RAM type DDR5 → LPDDR5X
  • Key travel 1 mm → 1.5 mm
Worse
  • GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS → 18.4 TFLOPS
  • GPU power (TGP) 175 W → 115 W
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,692 → 12,623
Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024) vs Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025) — full comparison
2024
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024)
Core i9-14900HX175 W16″2.45 kg
9.7
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS → 45.2 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,091 → 23,692
  • Video memory 12 GB → 16 GB
  • GPU shader cores 7,424 → 9,728
Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024) vs Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024) — full comparison
2024
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024)
Core i9-14900HX175 W16″2.45 kg
9.7
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS → 37.6 TFLOPS
  • GPU power (TGP) 140 W → 175 W
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,125 → 20,091
  • GPU shader cores 4,608 → 7,424
Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024) vs Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024) — full comparison
2024
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
Core i9-14900HX140 W16″2.45 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS → 21.8 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,916 → 13,125
  • GPU shader cores 3,072 → 4,608
Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024) vs Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024) — full comparison
2024
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024)
Core i9-14900HX140 W16″2.45 kg
9.5
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)
  • RAM (up to) 64 GB → 96 GB
  • Panel type IPS → OLED
  • SSD (up to) 4,096 GB → 8,192 GB
  • Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,817 → 19,017
Worse
  • GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS → 16 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,277 → 10,916
  • GPU shader cores 9,728 → 3,072
Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023) vs Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024) — full comparison
2023
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)
Core i9-13950HX175 W16″2.45 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS → 45.2 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,722 → 24,277
  • Video memory 12 GB → 16 GB
  • GPU shader cores 7,424 → 9,728
Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023) vs Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023) — full comparison
2023
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)
Core i9-13950HX175 W16″2.45 kg
9.6
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS → 37.6 TFLOPS
  • GPU power (TGP) 140 W → 175 W
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,981 → 20,722
  • GPU shader cores 4,608 → 7,424
Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023) — full comparison
2023
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
Core i9-13950HX140 W16″2.45 kg
9.5
Better than Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)
  • GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS → 21.8 TFLOPS
  • 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,133 → 13,981
  • GPU shader cores 3,072 → 4,608
Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023) — full comparison
2023
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)
Razer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)
Core i9-13950HX140 W16″2.45 kg
9.2

The first generation in our catalog.

Specifications

Key specs by generation

Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023) · 2023Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023) · 2023Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023) · 2023Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023) · 2023Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2024) · 2024Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2024) · 2024Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2024) · 2024Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024) · 2024Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025) · 2025Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025) · 2025Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) · 2025Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025) · 2025Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025) · 2025Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2026) · 2026Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026) · 2026Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026) · 2026
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4060 LaptopGeForce RTX 4070 LaptopGeForce RTX 4080 LaptopGeForce RTX 4090 LaptopGeForce RTX 4060 LaptopGeForce RTX 4070 LaptopGeForce RTX 4080 LaptopGeForce RTX 4090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Ti LaptopGeForce RTX 5080 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 LaptopGeForce RTX 5080 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
GPU power (TGP)140 W140 W175 W175 W140 W140 W175 W175 W115 W125 W140 W160 W160 W115 W175 W175 W
ProcessorCore i9-13950HXCore i9-13950HXCore i9-13950HXCore i9-13950HXCore i9-14900HXCore i9-14900HXCore i9-14900HXCore i9-14900HXRyzen AI 7 350Ryzen AI 7 350Ryzen AI 7 350Ryzen AI 7 350Ryzen AI 7 350Core Ultra 9 386HCore Ultra 9 386HCore Ultra 9 386H
Screen size16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″16″
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz240 Hz
RAM (up to)64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB96 GB96 GB96 GB96 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB64 GB
Battery capacity95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh95 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh90 Wh
Weight2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.45 kg2.1 kg2.1 kg2.1 kg2.1 kg2.1 kg2.14 kg2.14 kg2.14 kg
Score9.29.59.69.69.59.69.79.79.19.49.59.69.69.29.69.7
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare