vs
9.4Graphics9.6
8.7Overall performance8.9
9.3Display9.3
9.5Memory & storage9.5
7.4Battery & portability7.4
7.8Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)
| Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 250.5 mm | 250.5 mm | = |
| Width | 359.8 mm | 359.8 mm | = |
| Thickness | 17.4 mm | 17.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.1 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)?
Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 160 W+14%
- GPU compute (FP32)31.2 TFLOPS vs 39 TFLOPS+25%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light19,614 vs 23,953+22%
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,680+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 160 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 39 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 19,614 | 23,953 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,856 | 13,856 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,928 | 2,928 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 913 | 913 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 8,000 MHz | 8,000 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 8,192 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 17.4 mm | 17.4 mm |
| Width | 359.8 mm | 359.8 mm |
| Depth | 250.5 mm | 250.5 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.4 dB | 53.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5080 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.29.5
vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.69.5
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.59.5
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.69.5
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5080 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.79.5
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5060 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.49.5