vs
3.2Graphics2.3
5.3Overall performance3.4
6.3Display2.9
6.7Memory & storage6.7
7.3Battery & portability6.7
4.9Features & cooling2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023)
| Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024) | Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 233.5 mm | 250.3 mm | −16.8 mm |
| Width | 314.7 mm | 359.4 mm | −44.7 mm |
| Thickness | 22.3 mm | 22.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS vs 5 TFLOPS+64%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,915 vs 4,001+48%
- Brightness500 nits vs 250 nits2×
- GPU power (TGP)45 W vs 40 W+12%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,303 vs 9,731+26%
- Weight1.6 kg vs 1.98 kg+24%
- Response time7 ms vs 18 ms2.6×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core802 vs 605+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 2,048+25%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Why is Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023) better than Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Screen size14″ vs 15.6″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 45 W | 40 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | 5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,915 | 4,001 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13620H | Core i5-12450H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13620H | Core i5-12450H, Core i7-12650H, Core i7-13620H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,303 | 9,731 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,475 | 2,292 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 802 | 605 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 95% | 63% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 18 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 70% | 42% |
| Pixel density | 162 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,200 MHz | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 54 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 120 W | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | No | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 22.3 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 314.7 mm | 359.4 mm |
| Depth | 233.5 mm | 250.3 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 1 | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54.2 dB | 56.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)6.05.8
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)5.45.8
vs
MSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.85.4
vs
MSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.85.3
vs
MSI Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)5.85.8
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 3050 (2023)4.44.2
