vs
2.6Memory & storage6.7
4.0Battery & portability7.3
8.4Features & cooling4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)
| Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 272 mm | 233.5 mm | +38.5 mm |
| Width | 383 mm | 314.7 mm | +68.3 mm |
| Thickness | 33 mm | 22.3 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Weight | 2.9 kg | 1.6 kg | +1.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity100 Wh vs 54 Wh+87%
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 2,5602.9×
- CPU cores24 vs 102.4×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Video memory12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SD card readerYes · Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 14″+24%
Why is Cyborg 14 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight2.86 kg vs 1.6 kg+79%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Thickness33 mm vs 22.3 mm+48%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 45 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 8.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 5,915 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-14900HX | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 10 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core i7-13620H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,303 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,475 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 802 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 95% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 70% |
| Pixel density | — | 162 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.86 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Thickness | 33 mm | 22.3 mm |
| Width | 383 mm | 314.7 mm |
| Depth | 272 mm | 233.5 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 54.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | No |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7
vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.35.4
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IAX9 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
vs
HP Victus 15 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.15.4
vs
MSI Thin A15 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.45.4

