HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs MSI Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023)
What Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (13) and where Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Graphics4.7
9.1Overall performance6.3
4.7Display3.9
6.4Memory & storage4.2
7.3Battery & portability9.7
5.6Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023)
| Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 254.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 358.4 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 18.9 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.5 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)130 W vs 55 W2.4×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 60 Hz2.8×
- GPU compute (FP32)21.2 TFLOPS vs 13.5 TFLOPS+57%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,037 vs 9,419+38%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core14,310 vs 12,531+14%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,317 vs 943+40%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- CPU threads24 vs 22+9%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,578 vs 2,411+7%
Why is Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight2.09 kg vs 1.5 kg+39%
- Battery capacity97 Wh vs 100 Wh+3%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5
- SD card readerNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- Thickness19.8 mm vs 18.9 mm+5%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 189 ppi+33%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 130 W | 55 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.2 TFLOPS | 13.5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,037 | 9,419 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,310 | 12,531 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,578 | 2,411 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,317 | 943 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 97 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.09 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 18.9 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 358.4 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 254.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | White, Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 47 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)5.68.3
vsAsus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3
vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.28.3vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)6.28.3
vsAlienware X16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 RTX 4090 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.3