HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)
What Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (13) and where Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Graphics6.1
9.1Overall performance7.5
4.7Display7.4
6.4Memory & storage8.8
7.3Battery & portability7.6
5.6Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)
| Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 250.4 mm | +18.6 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 355.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 16.5 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)130 W vs 80 W+62%
- Battery capacity97 Wh vs 76 Wh+28%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- GPU compute (FP32)21.2 TFLOPS vs 15.6 TFLOPS+36%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,037 vs 10,965+19%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core14,310 vs 12,748+12%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,317 vs 972+35%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023): No
- CPU threads24 vs 22+9%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,578 vs 2,450+5%
Why is Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Weight2.09 kg vs 1.86 kg+12%
- Response time7 ms vs 1 ms7×
- HDRNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- SD card readerNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Thickness19.8 mm vs 16.5 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 130 W | 80 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.2 TFLOPS | 15.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,037 | 10,965 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,310 | 12,748 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,578 | 2,450 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,317 | 972 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 97 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.09 kg | 1.86 kg |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 16.5 mm |
| Width | 356.6 mm | 355.4 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 250.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | White, Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 47 dB | 41.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3
vsAlienware X16 RTX 4080 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3
vsAsus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.3
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 RTX 4090 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.3
vsAsus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.48.3vsAsus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.88.3