vs
2.2Memory & storage2.6
7.3Battery & portability8.0
7.6Features & cooling6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 259 mm | = |
| Width | 369 mm | 369 mm | = |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- CPU cores16 vs 10+60%
- Response time3 ms vs 7 ms2.3×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.3 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+10%
Why is Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- Video memory4 GB vs 16 GB4×
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 4,6082.2×
- Weight2.39 kg vs 2.33 kg+3%
- Thickness24 mm vs 23 mm+4%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 120 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 12,750 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Ryzen 5 8645HS, Core i7-14700HX, Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 62% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 41% |
| Pixel density | — | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.39 kg | 2.33 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 48 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.85.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.25.3
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3
vsMSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.85.3