vs
2.2Memory & storage3.2
7.3Battery & portability3.9
7.6Features & cooling3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 259 mm | = |
| Width | 369 mm | 359 mm | +10 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 54 Wh+55%
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SD card readerYes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Thickness24 mm vs 25 mm+4%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16.1″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 4,6082.2×
- Video memory4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Weight2.39 kg vs 2.25 kg+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 12,396 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 69% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 51% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.39 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.85.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.25.3
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.35.3