Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) vs MSI Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023)
What VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (10) and where Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Graphics9.5
8.4Overall performance9.5
9.1Display5.8
6.7Memory & storage8.6
9.6Battery & portability7.4
8.9Features & cooling8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023)
| VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) | Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249 mm | 298 mm | −49 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 380 mm | −25 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 23 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 3.1 kg | −1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Weight2 kg vs 3.1 kg+55%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core17,875 vs 16,342+9%
- HDRYes · Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core2,100 vs 1,975+6%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 133 ppi+42%
- Fan noise (max. load)56.9 dB vs 59 dB+4%
Why is Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023) better than VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)14.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS3.1×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,771 vs 23,4542.2×
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 9,7283.2×
- GPU power (TGP)125 W vs 175 W+40%
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- IR camera (face login)No · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 125 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.6 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,771 | 23,454 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-13950HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,875 | 16,342 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,823 | 3,021 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,100 | 1,975 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 350 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 133 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 380 mm |
| Depth | 249 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56.9 dB | 59 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)8.99.0vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4090 (2023)9.08.9vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4070 (2023)9.09.0vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 RTX 4090 (2023)9.09.0vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4070 (2023)9.09.0vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE78 HX RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.2