- pan.tf
- Compare
- ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (15) and where VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics6.0
9.4Overall performance8.4
9.3Display9.1
5.3Memory & storage6.7
3.6Battery & portability9.6
6.4Features & cooling8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 249 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355 mm | = |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22.9 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS3.1×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 10,7712.5×
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 3,0723.2×
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 350 nits3.1×
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 125 W+40%
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 512 GB3.9×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,038 vs 17,875+7%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
Why is VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Weight2.67 kg vs 2 kg+34%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Thickness30 mm vs 22.9 mm+31%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,961 vs 2,100+7%
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB+2%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 125 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 14.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 10,771 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-13980HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | 17,875 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | 2,823 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | 2,100 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 249 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 56.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.4 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.2vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.0vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4090 (2023)8.98.9vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.99.0vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4070 (2023)8.99.0vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.2