vs
4.2Display2.1
2.4Memory & storage2.3
9.4Battery & portability7.2
6.4Features & cooling3.5
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Victus 15 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 70 Wh+29%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Victus 15 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 3,200 MHz+75%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz+7%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Victus 15 RTX 4060 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- CPU cores8 vs 12+50%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 75 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 11.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 8,767 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core i5-12500H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13420H, Core i5-13500H, Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13700H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | No |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 16 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 1 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.29 kg |
| Thickness | — | 24 mm |
| Width | — | 358 mm |
| Depth | — | 255 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 45.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.8 mm |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
MSI Sword 15 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.66.0
vs
MSI Sword 17 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)5.86.0

