vs
4.2Display3.1
2.4Memory & storage5.7
9.4Battery & portability7.4
6.4Features & cooling3.0
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than G5 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 54 Wh+67%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · G5 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is G5 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 5,000 GB5×
- Weight2.27 kg vs 1.9 kg+19%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 5,000 GB5×
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.9 GHz+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 75 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 10.5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 7,444 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-12500H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 61% |
| Response time | — | 20 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 41% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | No |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 5,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 5,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Thickness | — | 22 mm |
| Width | — | 360 mm |
| Depth | — | 238 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 55.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)7.56.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.36.0
vs
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.0

