Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (13) and where Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Graphics3.4
3.4Overall performance5.3
4.4Display5.0
8.1Memory & storage7.1
8.4Battery & portability5.6
4.1Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) | Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 283 mm | 280 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 404 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 29.9 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 3.1 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)8,000 GB vs 4,096 GB+95%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+42%
- RAM (up to)128 GB vs 96 GB+33%
- Weight2.6 kg vs 3.1 kg+19%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,689 vs 13,640+15%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Response time3 ms vs 7 ms2.3×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Thickness27 mm vs 29.9 mm+11%
- Fan noise (max. load)32.5 dB vs 58.6 dB+80%
Why is Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core954 vs 2,0862.2×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,740 vs 21,832+59%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- SSD (base)250 GB vs 1,024 GB4.1×
- Advanced OptimusNo · TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- CPU threads16 vs 24+50%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- DCI-P3 coverage69% vs 98%+42%
- Pixel density126 ppi vs 168 ppi+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,689 | 13,640 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,740 | 21,832 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,690 | 3,163 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 954 | 2,086 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 69% | 98% |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 128 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 250 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 29.9 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 404 mm |
| Depth | 283 mm | 280 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 32.5 dB | 58.6 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)5.45.6
vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)4.85.6
vsAcer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)6.15.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)5.66.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)5.69.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A18 HX RTX 5070 Ti (2025)5.65.9