Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Gigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (5) and where Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (27) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Graphics9.8
3.4Overall performance9.3
4.4Display8.8
8.1Memory & storage9.2
8.4Battery & portability6.3
4.1Features & cooling9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) | Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 283 mm | 287 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 401 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 30 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 3.5 kg | −0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Weight2.6 kg vs 3.5 kg+35%
- Thickness27 mm vs 30 mm+11%
- Response time3 ms vs 5 ms+67%
- Fan noise (max. load)32.5 dB vs 53 dB+63%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
Why is Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,689 vs 32,9082.1×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+96%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Brightness300 nits vs 1,200 nits4×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,740 vs 22,441+63%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core954 vs 2,1322.2×
- RAM (up to)128 GB vs 192 GB+50%
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,689 | 32,908 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,740 | 22,441 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,690 | 3,342 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 954 | 2,132 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 5 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 69% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 8,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 250 GB | 4,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 3 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 3.5 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 401 mm |
| Depth | 283 mm | 287 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 4 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 32.5 dB | 53 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)5.45.6
vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)4.85.6
vsAcer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)6.15.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)5.66.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A18 HX RTX 5070 Ti (2025)5.65.9
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)5.15.6