Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs Lenovo Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) does better (23) and where Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Graphics5.8
9.2Overall performance5.5
8.7Display9.4
3.0Memory & storage2.8
6.7Battery & portability5.9
8.2Features & cooling8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 220 mm | 244 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 344 mm | −33 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 19 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.9 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light17,182 vs 9,372+83%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 14.9 TFLOPS+80%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 2,5602.3×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core16,499 vs 11,126+48%
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Weight1.58 kg vs 1.87 kg+18%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,230 vs 827+49%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
Why is Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity73 Wh vs 80 Wh+10%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): Yes
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Screen size14″ vs 15.3″+9%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 17,182 | 9,372 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Ryzen 7 250 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 386H | Ryzen 7 250 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 16,499 | 11,126 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,763 | 2,550 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,230 | 827 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 15.3″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 197 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 73 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.58 kg | 1.87 kg |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 19 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 344 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 244 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsLenovo Legion 7a 15 G11 Radeon 8060S (2026)8.78.9
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.68.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.79.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)8.79.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 6 Ultra RTX 5070 (2026)8.78.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.79.6