- pan.tf
- Compare
- ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) does better (8) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Graphics8.5
9.2Overall performance9.2
8.7Display9.7
3.0Memory & storage3.7
6.7Battery & portability9.6
8.2Features & cooling9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 220 mm | 246 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 354 mm | −43 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 16 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.8 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light17,182 vs 14,532+18%
- Weight1.58 kg vs 1.85 kg+17%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS+2%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026): No
- Pixel density243 ppi vs 189 ppi+29%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- Battery capacity73 Wh vs 90 Wh+23%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core16,499 vs 17,034+3%
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): Yes
- Thickness18 mm vs 16 mm+12%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,230 vs 1,274+4%
- Screen size14″ vs 16″+14%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,763 vs 2,885+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 17,182 | 14,532 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 16,499 | 17,034 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,763 | 2,885 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,230 | 1,274 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 73 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | 250 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.58 kg | 1.85 kg |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.5 dB | 54.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsLenovo Legion 7a 15 G11 Radeon 8060S (2026)8.78.9
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.68.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.79.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 6 Ultra RTX 5070 (2026)8.78.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.79.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5080 (2026)8.78.9