vs
6.7Display9.8
3.6Memory & storage3.5
8.6Battery & portability6.0
8.2Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025) | Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 265 mm | 260 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm | = |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 28 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Weight2.57 kg vs 2.65 kg+3%
- Thickness23 mm vs 28 mm+22%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
- Max CPU clock5.8 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+7%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 300 Hz2.5×
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity96 Wh vs 100 Wh+4%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Ethernet1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s5×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- SD card readerNo · Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 80 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 19.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,704 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H, Core 9 270H | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 71% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 96 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.57 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 265 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Magnesium alloy | — |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.6 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)7.77.6vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.68.0vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.0