vs
9.4Display9.8
3.9Memory & storage3.5
4.8Battery & portability6.0
7.4Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025) | Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 260 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 28 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.65 kg+6%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thickness30 mm vs 28 mm+7%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 260 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Zone RGB | — |
| Per-key RGB | No | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)8.17.6
vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)9.57.6
vsAsus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)5.57.6vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)7.67.3