Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (1) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Memory & storage2.6
Why is Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 300 Hz2.5×
- Battery capacity96 Wh vs 99 Wh+3%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 80 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 19.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,704 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.8 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H, Core 9 270H | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 71% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 96 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.57 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 265 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Magnesium alloy | — |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.6 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)7.77.6vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.78.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)