vs
9.6Graphics9.7
9.5Overall performance9.1
9.8Display8.2
8.6Memory & storage9.2
7.9Battery & portability3.2
9.2Features & cooling9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)m16 RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) | m16 RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 289.9 mm | −9.9 mm |
| Width | 380.4 mm | 368.9 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 25.4 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) better than m16 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Brightness1,000 nits vs 300 nits3.3×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
- Battery capacity100 Wh vs 86 Wh+16%
- CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core17,604 vs 14,664+20%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,809 vs 1,136+59%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Thickness21.9 mm vs 25.4 mm+16%
- CPU threads32 vs 20+60%
- Pixel density178 ppi vs 142 ppi+25%
Why is m16 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Refresh rate250 Hz vs 480 Hz+92%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,735 vs 26,858+9%
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Cooling fans3 vs 4+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 24,735 | 26,858 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900HX | Core i7-13650HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX | Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7845HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,604 | 14,664 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,036 | 2,818 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,809 | 1,136 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 250 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 178 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 86 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Width | 380.4 mm | 368.9 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 289.9 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 4 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 54.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.8 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.4
vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6
vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion 9i Gen 8 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6
vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.4
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4
