Alienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023) vs Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)
What m16 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (14) and where VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics7.5
9.1Overall performance8.9
8.2Display9.1
9.2Memory & storage6.7
3.2Battery & portability9.6
9.6Features & cooling8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
m16 RTX 4090 (2023)VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)
| m16 RTX 4090 (2023) | VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 289.9 mm | 249 mm | +40.9 mm |
| Width | 368.9 mm | 355 mm | +13.9 mm |
| Thickness | 25.4 mm | 22.9 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2 kg | +1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is m16 RTX 4090 (2023) better than VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Refresh rate480 Hz vs 165 Hz2.9×
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS2.3×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,858 vs 13,926+93%
- SSD (up to)8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB4×
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 125 W+40%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 4,6082.1×
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Cooling fans4 vs 3+33%
Why is VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) better than m16 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Weight3 kg vs 2 kg+50%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,136 vs 2,100+85%
- CPU cores14 vs 24+71%
- Battery capacity86 Wh vs 90 Wh+5%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core14,664 vs 17,875+22%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Brightness300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
- Thickness25.4 mm vs 22.9 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 125 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,858 | 13,926 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13650HX | Core i9-13980HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7845HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,664 | 17,875 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,818 | 2,823 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,136 | 2,100 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 480 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 8,192 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 86 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 25.4 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 368.9 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 289.9 mm | 249 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | Black, Silver |
| Cooling fans | 4 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54.7 dB | 56.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.4 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.4
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4vs
Alienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)9.49.4