Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)
What Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (12) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Graphics5.0
5.9Overall performance6.2
7.5Display7.2
3.9Memory & storage6.9
8.6Battery & portability9.3
5.4Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) | ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 221 mm | 246 mm | −25 mm |
| Width | 322 mm | 354 mm | −32 mm |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 17.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.8 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)21.1 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS+55%
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,446 vs 9,432+32%
- Weight1.6 kg vs 1.85 kg+16%
- Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 512 GB3.9×
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Pixel density243 ppi vs 189 ppi+29%
- RAM speed8,533 MHz vs 7,500 MHz+14%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 100 W+11%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core11,013 vs 13,586+23%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core620 vs 895+44%
- CPU threads8 vs 162×
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- Liquid metal (CPU)No · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | 100 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.1 TFLOPS | 13.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,446 | 9,432 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 8 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,013 | 13,586 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,816 | 2,864 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 620 | 895 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 140 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.85 kg |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 17.2 mm |
| Width | 322 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 221 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 67 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.26.8vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.27.6vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.27.6
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.2
vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2
vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)6.87.2