- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (19) and where Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Graphics7.2
7.6Overall performance5.9
9.1Display7.5
8.1Memory & storage3.9
3.8Battery & portability8.6
6.6Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 221 mm | +50.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 322 mm | +38.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- CPU cores20 vs 82.5×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 6203×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 11,013+73%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- CPU threads20 vs 82.5×
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- HDRYes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)10.8 TFLOPS vs 21.1 TFLOPS+95%
- GPU power (TGP)70 W vs 90 W+29%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,593 vs 12,446+45%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.6 kg+44%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 17 mm+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 70 W | 90 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.8 TFLOPS | 21.1 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,593 | 12,446 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 11,013 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,816 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 620 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 322 mm |
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 221 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 67 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)7.37.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 4070 (2025)7.37.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.1
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.26.8vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.27.6vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.27.6