- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (19) and where Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Graphics7.2
7.6Overall performance6.0
9.2Display7.5
8.4Memory & storage4.1
3.8Battery & portability8.7
6.8Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 221 mm | +50.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 322 mm | +38.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- CPU cores20 vs 82.5×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 6203×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 11,013+73%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- CPU threads20 vs 82.5×
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- HDRYes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)10.8 TFLOPS vs 21.1 TFLOPS+95%
- GPU power (TGP)70 W vs 90 W+29%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,593 vs 12,446+45%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.6 kg+44%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 17 mm+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 70 W | 90 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.8 TFLOPS | 21.1 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,593 | 12,446 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 11,013 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,816 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 620 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 322 mm |
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 221 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 67 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)7.47.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2025)7.46.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.47.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 4070 (2025)7.47.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)7.47.4