- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (12) and where Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025) wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Graphics9.8
8.4Overall performance9.6
8.4Display7.5
4.3Memory & storage5.5
9.4Battery & portability2.8
8.8Features & cooling8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 254.7 mm | 298 mm | −43.3 mm |
| Width | 323.9 mm | 380 mm | −56.1 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 29 mm | −8.2 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 3 kg | −1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Weight1.9 kg vs 3 kg+58%
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 29 mm+39%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Pixel density234 ppi vs 133 ppi+76%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
- RAM speed8,400 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+31%
Why is Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,815 vs 30,0992×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+96%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,090 vs 2,129+95%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core15,698 vs 22,395+43%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,815 | 30,099 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255H | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 285HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,698 | 22,395 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,833 | 3,282 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,090 | 2,129 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 234 ppi | 133 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,400 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 323.9 mm | 380 mm |
| Depth | 254.7 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 59.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.78.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsMSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)9.08.8
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)9.08.8