Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (10) and where Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Graphics8.8
8.4Overall performance9.2
8.4Display9.3
4.3Memory & storage4.4
9.4Battery & portability5.9
8.8Features & cooling8.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 254.7 mm | 269 mm | −14.3 mm |
| Width | 323.9 mm | 357 mm | −33.1 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight1.9 kg vs 2.68 kg+41%
- Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
- Advanced OptimusYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- SD card readerYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 23 mm+11%
- Pixel density234 ppi vs 142 ppi+65%
- RAM speed8,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+50%
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 38.5 TFLOPS+47%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 83 Wh+9%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,090 vs 1,925+77%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core15,698 vs 19,492+24%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,815 vs 16,879+14%
- CPU cores16 vs 20+25%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 38.5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,815 | 16,879 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255H | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,698 | 19,492 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,833 | 3,115 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,090 | 1,925 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | 234 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.68 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 323.9 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 254.7 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 61.1 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.78.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)8.78.8
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.09.0