Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (9) and where Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (22) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Graphics7.2
3.7Overall performance6.0
3.4Display7.5
5.5Memory & storage4.1
3.1Battery & portability8.7
6.2Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 221 mm | +43 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 322 mm | +35.7 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.6 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 120 Hz+50%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
- CPU threads12 vs 8+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)53.3 dB vs 67 dB+26%
- Screen size16″ vs 14″+14%
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)12.2 TFLOPS vs 21.1 TFLOPS+73%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,024 vs 12,446+38%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.6 kg+31%
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 90 W+6%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core9,130 vs 11,013+21%
- Response time4 ms vs 1 ms4×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- Brightness300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 90 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.2 TFLOPS | 21.1 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,024 | 12,446 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Ryzen 5 240, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Core 7 240H, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 355, Core 9 270H, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 9 288V |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,130 | 11,013 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,523 | 2,816 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 594 | 620 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | — | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Response time | 4 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 72% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 17 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 322 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 221 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.3 dB | 67 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)4.75.0vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsInfinix GT Book RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.8vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHonor Magicbook Pro 16 RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.5vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.9
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.37.0vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.6