Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (15) and where Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Graphics4.1
3.7Overall performance4.6
3.4Display2.2
5.4Memory & storage4.6
3.1Battery & portability7.8
6.1Features & cooling4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 250.6 mm | +13.4 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 356.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 60 Hz3×
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 70 W+21%
- MUX switchYes · Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Response time4 ms vs 35 ms8.8×
- GPU compute (FP32)12.2 TFLOPS vs 11.2 TFLOPS+9%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Cooling fans2 vs 12×
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024): No
Why is Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- CPU cores8 vs 14+75%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core9,130 vs 10,330+13%
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.9 kg+11%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core594 vs 717+21%
- HDRNo · Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- CPU threads12 vs 18+50%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 70 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.2 TFLOPS | 11.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,024 | 8,934 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core Ultra 5 125H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 18 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Ryzen 5 240, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Core 7 240H, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 355, Core 9 270H, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 5 125H, Core i7-13620H, Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,130 | 10,330 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,523 | 2,173 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 594 | 717 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Response time | 4 ms | 35 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 72% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | No |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 130 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 356.8 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 250.6 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Blue |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.3 dB | 51 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 1.4 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)4.65.0vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHonor Magicbook Pro 16 RTX 4060 (2024)4.64.5vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsInfinix GT Book RTX 4060 (2024)4.64.8
vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)4.95.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)4.24.9vs
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)4.95.6